Design partnerships

Co-design one complete pathway before expanding the catalog.

A future design partnership would test whether one governed, caregiver-mediated practice can be clearer for families and workable for a responsible clinic team.

No clinic design-partner cohort, pilot enrolment, application, agreement, or implementation program is currently open. General contact does not create a partnership or place in a future cohort.

Current status

The partnership program is not yet available.

Future model

A real partnership needs shared work and separate accountability.

Responsible clinic

A participating clinic would retain the professional relationship, clinical judgement, safeguarding, continuity, and applicable record duties.

Governed technology

Nurturevia would provide only the reviewed product, training, permissions, support, and factual workflow defined in a signed responsibility model.

Honest evaluation

A feasibility question would be reported as feasibility, not converted into an effectiveness claim or marketing endorsement.

Before recruitment

The operating questions must be answered first.

A future program would need

  • Named clinic and product owners with authority to stop the work.
  • Exact pathway, population, eligibility, exclusions, burden, and support model.
  • Defined consent, child assent and dissent, safeguarding, complaints, withdrawal, and continuity processes.
  • Approved information fields, controller and processor roles, retention, access, export, and deletion responsibilities.

A future program would exclude

  • Diagnostic AI, hidden child profiling, or clinical conclusions from ordinary games.
  • Referral leads, paid ranking, public clinic badges, or implied endorsement.
  • Unreviewed treatment content or protected assessments without authorization.
  • An efficacy promise based only on product usability or implementation feedback.

A general collaboration question can use the adult contact route.